The best context for understanding decadal temperature changes comes from the world’s sea surface temperatures (SST), for several reasons:
- The ocean covers 71% of the globe and drives average temperatures;
- SSTs have a constant water content, (unlike air temperatures), so give a better reading of heat content variations;
- A major El Nino was the dominant climate feature in recent years.
HadSST is generally regarded as the best of the global SST data sets, and so the temperature story here comes from that source, the latest version being HadSST3. More on what distinguishes HadSST3 from other SST products at the end.
The Current Context
The year end report below showed 2020 rapidly cooling in all regions. The anomalies have continued to drop sharply well below the mean since 1995. This Global Cooling was also evident in the UAH Land and Ocean air temperatures ( See March 2021 Ocean Chill Deepens)
The chart below shows SST monthly anomalies as reported in HadSST3 starting in 2015 through June 2021. After three straight Spring 2020 months of cooling led by the tropics and SH, NH spiked in the summer, along with smaller bumps elsewhere. Then temps everywhere dropped the last six months, hitting bottom in February 2021. All regions were well below the Global Mean since 2015, matching the cold of 2018, and lower than January 2015. Now the spring is bringing more temperate waters and a return to the mean anomaly since 2015. June Global SST anomaly cooled off back to April due to dropping temps in SH and the Tropics. NH continued its summer rise, but only slightly and well below the last two Junes.
A global cooling pattern is seen clearly in the Tropics since its peak in 2016, joined by NH and SH cycling downward since 2016.
Note that higher temps in 2015 and 2016 were first of all due to a sharp rise in Tropical SST, beginning in March 2015, peaking in January 2016, and steadily declining back below its beginning level. Secondly, the Northern Hemisphere added three bumps on the shoulders of Tropical warming, with peaks in August of each year. A fourth NH bump was lower and peaked in September 2018. As noted above, a fifth peak in August 2019 and a sixth August 2020 exceeded the four previous upward bumps in NH.
In 2019 all regions had been converging to reach nearly the same value in April. Then NH rose exceptionally by almost 0.5C over the four summer months, in August 2019 exceeding previous summer peaks in NH since 2015. In the 4 succeeding months, that warm NH pulse reversed sharply. Then again NH temps warmed to a 2020 summer peak, matching 2019. This has now been reversed with all regions pulling the Global anomaly downward sharply, tempered by warming in March to May, and now dropping below the global mean anomaly since 2015.
And as before, note that the global release of heat was not dramatic, due to the Southern Hemisphere offsetting the Northern one. Note the May warming was strongest in the Tropics, though the anomaly is quite cool compared to 2016.
A longer view of SSTs
The graph below is noisy, but the density is needed to see the seasonal patterns in the oceanic fluctuations. Previous posts focused on the rise and fall of the last El Nino starting in 2015. This post adds a longer view, encompassing the significant 1998 El Nino and since. The color schemes are retained for Global, Tropics, NH and SH anomalies. Despite the longer time frame, I have kept the monthly data (rather than yearly averages) because of interesting shifts between January and July.
1995 is a reasonable (ENSO neutral) starting point prior to the first El Nino. The sharp Tropical rise peaking in 1998 is dominant in the record, starting Jan. ’97 to pull up SSTs uniformly before returning to the same level Jan. ’99. For the next 2 years, the Tropics stayed down, and the world’s oceans held steady around 0.2C above 1961 to 1990 average.
Then comes a steady rise over two years to a lesser peak Jan. 2003, but again uniformly pulling all oceans up around 0.4C. Something changes at this point, with more hemispheric divergence than before. Over the 4 years until Jan 2007, the Tropics go through ups and downs, NH a series of ups and SH mostly downs. As a result the Global average fluctuates around that same 0.4C, which also turns out to be the average for the entire record since 1995.
2007 stands out with a sharp drop in temperatures so that Jan.08 matches the low in Jan. ’99, but starting from a lower high. The oceans all decline as well, until temps build peaking in 2010.
Now again a different pattern appears. The Tropics cool sharply to Jan 11, then rise steadily for 4 years to Jan 15, at which point the most recent major El Nino takes off. But this time in contrast to ’97-’99, the Northern Hemisphere produces peaks every summer pulling up the Global average. In fact, these NH peaks appear every July starting in 2003, growing stronger to produce 3 massive highs in 2014, 15 and 16. NH July 2017 was only slightly lower, and a fifth NH peak still lower in Sept. 2018.
The highest summer NH peaks came in 2019 and 2020, only this time the Tropics and SH are offsetting rather adding to the warming. (Note: these are high anomalies on top of the highest absolute temps in the NH.) Since 2014 SH has played a moderating role, offsetting the NH warming pulses. After September 2020 temps dropped off down until February 2021, then all regions rose to bring the global anomaly above the mean since 1995, before backing down in June 2021.
What to make of all this? The patterns suggest that in addition to El Ninos in the Pacific driving the Tropic SSTs, something else is going on in the NH. The obvious culprit is the North Atlantic, since I have seen this sort of pulsing before. After reading some papers by David Dilley, I confirmed his observation of Atlantic pulses into the Arctic every 8 to 10 years.
But the peaks coming nearly every summer in HadSST require a different picture. Let’s look at August, the hottest month in the North Atlantic from the Kaplan dataset.
The AMO Index is from from Kaplan SST v2, the unaltered and not detrended dataset. By definition, the data are monthly average SSTs interpolated to a 5×5 grid over the North Atlantic basically 0 to 70N. The graph shows August warming began after 1992 up to 1998, with a series of matching years since, including 2020. Because the N. Atlantic has partnered with the Pacific ENSO recently, let’s take a closer look at some AMO years in the last 2 decades.
This graph shows monthly AMO temps for some important years. The Peak years were 1998, 2010 and 2016, with the latter emphasized as the most recent. The other years show lesser warming, with 2007 emphasized as the coolest in the last 20 years. Note the red 2018 line is at the bottom of all these tracks. The black line shows that 2020 began slightly warm, then set records for 3 months. then dropped below 2016 and 2017, peaked in August ending below 2016. Now in 2021, AMO is tracking the coldest years, warming slightly in May and June.
The oceans are driving the warming this century. SSTs took a step up with the 1998 El Nino and have stayed there with help from the North Atlantic, and more recently the Pacific northern “Blob.” The ocean surfaces are releasing a lot of energy, warming the air, but eventually will have a cooling effect. The decline after 1937 was rapid by comparison, so one wonders: How long can the oceans keep this up? If the pattern of recent years continues, NH SST anomalies may rise slightly in coming months, but once again, ENSO which has weakened will probably determine the outcome.
Footnote: Why Rely on HadSST3
HadSST3 is distinguished from other SST products because HadCRU (Hadley Climatic Research Unit) does not engage in SST interpolation, i.e. infilling estimated anomalies into grid cells lacking sufficient sampling in a given month. From reading the documentation and from queries to Met Office, this is their procedure.
HadSST3 imports data from gridcells containing ocean, excluding land cells. From past records, they have calculated daily and monthly average readings for each grid cell for the period 1961 to 1990. Those temperatures form the baseline from which anomalies are calculated.
In a given month, each gridcell with sufficient sampling is averaged for the month and then the baseline value for that cell and that month is subtracted, resulting in the monthly anomaly for that cell. All cells with monthly anomalies are averaged to produce global, hemispheric and tropical anomalies for the month, based on the cells in those locations. For example, Tropics averages include ocean grid cells lying between latitudes 20N and 20S.
Gridcells lacking sufficient sampling that month are left out of the averaging, and the uncertainty from such missing data is estimated. IMO that is more reasonable than inventing data to infill. And it seems that the Global Drifter Array displayed in the top image is providing more uniform coverage of the oceans than in the past.
USS Pearl Harbor deploys Global Drifter Buoys in Pacific Ocean
It would be very meaningful and important to point out the clear fact that SSTs are controlled by the global oceans, not. vice versa, that respond to the energy they receive from the Sun. The atmosphere land land both have a low heat capacity. It would get very cold at night without the oceans.
The oceans’ massive heat content is 1,000 times that of the atmosphere, and the evaporative response of the oceans to solar heating controls the average SST – and also the lapse rate – not GHE.
The oceans control planetary climate, mainly within the tropical zone, by controlling the heat returned to space and also the heat reaching the surface, by varying the clouds in response to SST. Currently at around 150W/m^2 of negative feedback. THis feedback is regulated by the changing amount of convected latent heat of evaporation leaving the surface in the adiabatic convective equilibirum of water vapour, that also creates the Tropospheric clouds.
This heat transport elevator also creates the lapse rate, dependent on the planetary gravitational pressure. The so called GHE, caused by the scattering of the small amount of radiated LWIR electromagnetic energy from the surface in its weak interaction with the atmosphere as it returns to space, is so small it is unobservable within the dominant cause of the lapse rate. A simple fact of observation of the Laplse Rate and the failure of natural climate cycles to change from the past observed cycles.
THis is well described by the basic barometric equation, well know to meteorologists, but apparently unknown to climate “scientists”, or dismissed by them as climate change denial. I suggest this is a rather important reality, deterministoc physical laws trump the unrepeatable predictions of presumptive models tha. whose predictions are overtly wrong..
I only just found this, in the search to understand the actual heating effect on the atmosphere of the “lost” radiation in the TOA spectrum. The answer is, self evidently, not a lot within the overall scale of the climate control system.
THis is a well kept secret, well concealed by those who would deceive us to “prove” their consensual science that CO2 controls the climate. No it obviously does not..
The TRUTH is that received surface energy and the atmospheric pressure due to gravity are the two factors that determine the lapse rate, and maintain planetary heat balance and SST stability as you move towards the tropopause. The relationship is maintained down to 0.1Bar. Simples!
Meteorological physics based science KNOWS this. Climate science does not.
Check it out, save yourself the 4 years it took me to find it.
Where do you see it on forums like this? Why not? Here it is. Did I miss something?
Brian, I agree. H2O is the climate molecule, not CO2. Numerous posts here elaborate on the theme Oceans Make Climate, going into the particulars of how that happens.