Fresh evidence this week linking climate alarm and suicidal fascination. I am referring to all the mass media reports right now that climate change will cause large numbers of suicides. The claim (yet again from my alma mater Stanford) is ludicrous for many reasons:
1. A suicide is a personal event with many contributing factors, weather and climate being the most peripheral.
2. Serious suicide researchers have identified risk factors that inform caregivers, no mention of climate. Franklin et al. provide this analysis of experience with suicidal incidents Risk Factors for Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis of 50 Years of Research.
With such complexity of influencing factors, putting emphasis on a bit of warming is both myopic and lopsided. For example, some places report springtime suicides are more frequent, others see more such deaths in Summer or Autumn. The seasonal relationship is quite mixed in studies with various theories being suggested along with great uncertainty.
3. Suicides occur more frequently in colder climates than in warmer ones. For example, European studies find the highest rates in eastern European nations and lowest rates in Mediterranean countries.
4. Preventing suicides is a serious issue, and has nothing to do with reducing CO2.
But the whole climate alarm movement is stained with a suicidal impulse and disdain for humanity
Micheal Walsh published The Suicidal Narrative of the Modern Environmental Left, November 16, 2017.
Walsh presents two recent experiences showing how environmental concerns are embedded everywhere including plane trips and merchandising, then gets into the implications. His text with my bolds and images.
It’s all just advertising, of course, and thus harmless enough. It also goes to reinforcing the narrative: that selfish man is the cause of species endangerment, that primitive societies are superior to developed ones (but then who would buy the locally sourced cocoa beans and moringa leaves?), and that traditional medicine—which is to say, no medicine at all—is somehow superior to what those pill-pushing quacks foist on you before they climb in their BMWs and head out to the links for a round or two of golf. Were that true, the ancient Greeks and Romans might all have lived into their 80s, instead of dying in their 20s and 30s, as unsustainable folks tended to do back then.
Which brings us, ineluctably, to “climate change” and this piece in the Times: “The More Education Republicans Have, the Less They Tend to Believe in Climate Change.” Yes, you read that right:
“Climate change divides Americans, but in an unlikely way: The more education that Democrats and Republicans have, the more their beliefs in climate change diverge. About one in four Republicans with only a high school education said they worried about climate change a great deal. But among college-educated Republicans, that figure decreases, sharply, to 8 percent.”
The author’s underlying assumption is that the more you know about “man-made climate change,” the more eager you should be to chow down on Endangered Species Chocolate or shovel some women’s-collective moringa into your smoothie before you leave your ant-farm apartment to hop on the mass-transit system on your way to a day job that somehow involves you, personally, saving the planet—not so much by what you do, but by what you don’t do.
But that’s not a future we on the Right want to embrace. I take this poll as a heartening sign that the more you educate yourself about the transparent fraud of “man-made climate change,” the less you’re likely to believe in their genteel fictions of peaceful, happy villages in Liberia or their apocalyptic notions of the End of the World as We Know It, just about any day now. As we’ve learned time and again, mountebanks and charlatans are always promising that the end of days is just around the corner, if only we will repent; find Jesus; join their cult; give away all our possessions; or at least sign up for a lifetime supply of snake oil, delivered by Amazon drones right to our doorsteps.
We’ve seen this movie before, of course. In April, Mark J. Perry of the American Enterprise Institute detailed 18 different instances when “[t]he prophets of doom were not simply wrong, but spectacularly wrong.”
Never mind that the Earth’s climate is always changing; we wouldn’t be here at all if it hadn’t. Never mind that there’s little humans can do to interfere with planetary processes, most of which are beyond our ken. Never mind that we flatter ourselves if we think so. Never mind that to characterize carbon dioxide—which we exhale so that the Amazon rain forest and those West African moringa plants might inhale—as a dangerous “greenhouse gas” is profoundly anti-human.
It’s what you’d expect from a political philosophy that denies God and sees itself as its own worst enemy: a narrative that must end in suicide, and all in the name of the greater good. All we ask our friends on the Left is not to take us with you.
More on the bogus Stanford research linking suicides to climate: Stanford Jumps Suicide Climate Shark
TOP post Ron. Thanks for helping to clear up the latest disrespectful and dishonest BS from the climate ‘science’ community and sycophant mainstream media with evidence, reason and common sense…
“Suicides occur more frequently in colder climates than in warmer ones. For example, European studies find the highest rates in eastern European nations and lowest rates in Mediterranean countries…”
Your excellent post cited here: https://climatism.blog/2018/07/24/disgrace-shameless-link-between-suicide-and-climate-change-circulating-the-mainstream-medias-echo-chamber/
Good piece, Ron.
I’ve experienced thoughts of expiring due to climate change. It was related to getting on an airplane in New Orleans at 85F and getting off a plan in SW Michigan about 85F lower and spending a few days running around in that weather. I learned you could live through it even after they decide to transfer you to Michigan.
San Diego has a”legally binding 100% clean energy Climate Action Plan.” Nicole Capretz was the primary author of the plan and she is working with other cities in CA to develop similar plans (community choice energy organizations being one way to implement the plan). She gave a talk at the CEC last year on how the plan came to be approved.
kakatoa (nice handle BTW), you well know that San Diego going 100% green electricity is a crock, based on the delusion that “clean” electrons can be separated and purchased apart from “dirty” electrons. One post explains why the grid depends upon base load power not from renewables, so this virtue is limited to a few who can afford the badges.
Another post breaks the bad news to Dutch people who had been similarly duped.