This study was first published on August 20, 2014 at No Tricks Zone. The dataset ends with 2013 records.

In a previous study of World Class station records, the effects of urban development could not be discounted since the 25 long service records come from European cities. This is a study to see what the best sites in the US can tell us about temperature trends in the last century. There are two principal findings below.

Surfacestations.org provides a list of 23 stations that have the CRN#1 Rating for the quality of the sites. I obtained the records from the latest GHCNv3 monthly qcu report, did my own data quality review and built a Temperature Trend Analysis workbook.

As it happens, the stations are spread out across the continental US (CONUS): NW: Oregon, North Dakota, Montana; SW: California, Nevada, Colorado, Texas; MW: Indiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana; NE: New York, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania; SE: Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida.

The records themselves vary in quality of coverage, but are all included here because of their CRN#1 rating. The gold medal goes to Savannah for 100% monthly coverage, with a single missing daily observation since 1874. Pensacola was a close second among the four stations with perfect monthly coverage. Most stations were missing less than 20 months with coverages above 95%.

1. First Class US stations show little warming in the last century.

Area	FIRST CLASS US STATIONS
History	1874 to 2013
Stations	23
Average Length	118	Years
Average Trend	0.16	°C/Century
Standard Deviation	0.66	°C/Century
Max Trend	1.18	°C/Century
Min Trend	-1.93	°C/Century

The average station shows a rise of about 0.16°C/Century. The large deviation, and the fact that multiple stations had cooling rates shows that warming has not been extreme, and varies considerably from place to place. The observed warming for this group is less than half the rate reported in the European study.

2. Temperature trends are local, not global.

Most remarkable about these stations is the extensive local climate diversity that appears when station sites are relatively free of urban heat sources. 35% (8 of 23) stations reported cooling over the century. Indeed, if we remove the 8 warmest records, the rate flips from +0.16°C to -0.14°C.

And the multidecadal patterns of warming and cooling were quite variable from place to place. Averages over 30-year periods suggest how unusual these patterns are.

For the set of stations the results are:

°C/Century	Start	End
0.78	Start	1920
-1.21	1921	1950
-1.11	1951	1980
1.51	1981	2013
0.99	1950	2013

The first period varied in length from each station’s beginning to 1920. Surprisingly the second period cooled in spite of the 1930s. Warming appears mostly since 1980. As mentioned above, within these averages are many differing local patterns.

Conclusion:

Question: Is it warmer now than 100 years ago?
Answer: It depends upon where you live. The best observations from US stations show a barely noticeable average warming of 0.16°C / Century. And 35% of stations showed cooling at the same time that others were warming more than the average.

Note about Data Quality.

The attached workbook for Truman Dam & Reservoir is an example of my data quality review method. There are sheets showing the incoming qcu values, removal of flags and errors, audit of outliers (values exceeding 2 St. Dev.) and CUSUM and 1st Differences analyses to test for systemic bias. Note that Truman missed out entirely on warming from 1956 to 2002, in contrast to the conventional notion of global warming from the 1970s to 2000.

Truman Dam & Reservoir also provides a cautionary tale about temperature analysis. The station’s annual averages appear to rise dramatically from 2003 to present. On closer inspection, that period is missing values for 6 Decembers, 8 Januarys and 5 Februarys. So the annual warming is mostly the result of missing data-points.

This shows why analyzing the temperatures themselves can be misleading. By relying only on the station’s monthly slopes, TTA analysis effectively places missing values on the trend line of the existing values.

Note about Fall et al. (2011).

This was the first study to use CRN 1 to 5 ratings to look at US temperature trends in relation to station siting quality. Much discussed at the time was the finding of CRN 1&2 showing warming of 0.155 C/Decade for the period 1979 to 2008. The comparable finding from this analysis is 0.151 C/Decade for CRN 1 stations.

Little noticed was Figure 10 on page 10 of Fall et al. That graph shows that CRN 1&2 rate of warming Tavg unadjusted was about 0.2 C/Century for the period 1895 to 2008. This analysis shows a comparable 0.16 C for CRN 1 for the same period up to 2013.

Excel Workbook is here: First Class US TTA

Truman Dam and Reservoir is here: 238466